Personal opinion: If someone is real, atleast don't pretend them to be fake. If we keep pretending that way then we will think that they are fake, even if they are real.If I pretend that someone's mobile number has been hacked and some AI spoke in the voice of that person, many might have believed that 🤣. I use the logic of finding the truth through right source whenever I verify any information, whether it is true or not. Atleast, let's don't get confused from real and fake. Thanks 🙂
Verify information through trusted sources
Este título foi resumido pela IA a partir da publicação abaixo.
Publicações mais relevantes
-
Powerful groups of AI bots can now mimic humans to coordinate massive attacks on democracy, requiring new global defenses and a fix for the social media profit models that allow them to thrive. https://lnkd.in/d5j2_nfn
-
When a conversation with an LLM gets too long, the LLM will no longer be able to process it. So how do you build an AI bot that is supposed to chat indefinitely? In my latest blog post, I cover the fundamentals of LLM conversation *compaction*. If you don't do it right, the conversation will come unhinged! See the comments for the link.
-
All three of Sam’s “scary scenarios” are the same failure in disguise: We’re handing influence to systems that have no enforced boundary at execution. Bad actors, loss of control, over-reliance—none of those require superintelligence. They happen the moment AI can shape decisions without being able to be stopped. Right now most systems: recommend → persuade → defer to humans That’s not control. That’s drift. If an AI-driven action can’t be blocked at the moment it becomes real, then dependency rises while authority quietly disappears. The solution isn’t limiting intelligence. It’s making sure nothing executes unless the current state can justify it—every time. Until that exists, all three risks are already here.
